Kay Burks v. Independent Bank
This text of Kay Burks v. Independent Bank (Kay Burks v. Independent Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 28, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 157757 & (18) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement KAY BURKS, Megan K. Cavanagh, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 157757 COA: 341566 Bay CC: 16-003812-CD INDEPENDENT BANK, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 28, 2019 s0520 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kay Burks v. Independent Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kay-burks-v-independent-bank-mich-2019.