Kawar v. Martin
This text of 12 A.D.2d 876 (Kawar v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Upon the facts here presented, it was not requisite to the maintenance of an action against the appellant Sommers to allege in the complaint due service of a notice as required by section 52 of the County Law and section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. (Appeal from part of order of Onondaga Special Term denying motion by defendant Sommers for a dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky, and Henry, JJ. [25 Misc 2d 3.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.D.2d 876, 210 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kawar-v-martin-nyappdiv-1961.