Kaw Valley Drainage Dist. of Wyandotte County v. United States Trust Co.

Eighth Circuit

Kaw Valley Drainage Dist. of Wyandotte County v. United States Trust Co.

186 F. 324, 108 C.C.A. 402, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4116

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 24, 1911·No. Nos. 3,567-3,570·Published

Opinion

WM. II. MUNGER, District Judge.

Each of the foregoing cases are in all material respects like the ease of Kaw Valley Drainage District of Wyandotte County, Kansas, George Stumpf, D. J. Mason, and Al Mebus v. Metropolitan Water Company, 186 Fed. 315, just decided, and for the reasons there expressed the judgment in each case, granting to complainant a temporary injunction, is reversed, and the causes are remanded for proceedings in accordance with the opinion in the ease of Kaw Valley Drainage District, etc., et al. v. Metropolitan Water Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WM. II. MUNGER, District Judge.

Each of the foregoing cases are in all material respects like the ease of Kaw Valley Drainage District of Wyandotte County, Kansas, George Stumpf, D. J. Mason, and Al Mebus v. Metropolitan Water Company, 186 Fed. 315, just decided, and for the reasons there expressed the judgment in each case, granting to complainant a temporary injunction, is reversed, and the causes are remanded for proceedings in accordance with the opinion in the ease of Kaw Valley Drainage District, etc., et al. v. Metropolitan Water Company.

Kaw Valley Drainage Dist. of Wyandotte County v. United States Trust Co., 186 F. 324, 108 C.C.A. 402, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4116 (8th Cir. 1911).

Pincite

186 F. 324 (Kaw Valley Drainage Dist. of Wyandotte County v. United States Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related