Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/K.A.W. v. State

K.A.W. v. State

631 So. 2d 1140, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1233, 1994 WL 46920
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 18, 1994
DocketNo. 93-365
StatusPublished

This text of 631 So. 2d 1140 (K.A.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
K.A.W. v. State, 631 So. 2d 1140, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1233, 1994 WL 46920 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

HARRIS, Chief Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s finding that K.A.W. committed the offense. However, since adjudication was withheld, the imposition of costs under section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1991) was improper. See T.J. v. State, 619 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

THOMPSON, J., concurs. GRIFFIN, J., concurs specially in result only, without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T.J. v. State
619 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
631 So. 2d 1140, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1233, 1994 WL 46920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaw-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.