Kavanagh v. Stenhouse

368 U.S. 516, 82 S. Ct. 529, 7 L. Ed. 2d 521, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1774
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 19, 1962·No. 615·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kavanagh v. Stenhouse, 368 U.S. 516, 82 S. Ct. 529, 7 L. Ed. 2d 521, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1774 (1962).

368 U.S. 516 (Kavanagh v. Stenhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rainsberger v. Leypoldt
368 U.S. 516 (Supreme Court, 1962)