Kauther v. Vigransky

Ohio Circuit Courts

Kauther v. Vigransky

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 650

DecidedDecember 19, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 650 (Kauther v. Vigransky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kauther v. Vigransky, 22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 650 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, J.

Upon examination of the record in above ease the court is of the opinion that the verdict is fully sustained by the evi[651]*651dence. The evidence does not substantiate the claim of plaintiff in error as set up in the petition, that defendants were his agents and that fraud was practiced upon him. On the contrary, he emphatically denies such relationship and practically admits the claim of defendants in error.

Any errors of law that may exist, if in fact any such do exist, are therefore not prejudicial to plaintiff in error and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, J.

Upon examination of the record in above ease the court is of the opinion that the verdict is fully sustained by the evi[651]*651dence. The evidence does not substantiate the claim of plaintiff in error as set up in the petition, that defendants were his agents and that fraud was practiced upon him. On the contrary, he emphatically denies such relationship and practically admits the claim of defendants in error.

Any errors of law that may exist, if in fact any such do exist, are therefore not prejudicial to plaintiff in error and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kauther-v-vigransky-ohiocirct-1908.