Kauther v. Vigransky

Hamilton Circuit Court

Kauther v. Vigransky

12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 48, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 261

DecidedDecember 19, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 48 (Kauther v. Vigransky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kauther v. Vigransky, 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 48, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 261 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon examination of the record in -above case -the court is of the opinion that the verdict is fully sustained by the evidence. The evidence does not substantiate the claim of plaintiff in error as set up in the petition, that defendants were his agents and that fraud was practiced upon him. On the contrary, he emphatically denies such relationship and practically admits the claim of defendants in error.

Any errors of law that may exist, if in fact any such do exist, are therefore not prejudicial- to plaintiff in error and the judgment of the trial court is -affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon examination of the record in -above case -the court is of the opinion that the verdict is fully sustained by the evidence. The evidence does not substantiate the claim of plaintiff in error as set up in the petition, that defendants were his agents and that fraud was practiced upon him. On the contrary, he emphatically denies such relationship and practically admits the claim of defendants in error.

Any errors of law that may exist, if in fact any such do exist, are therefore not prejudicial- to plaintiff in error and the judgment of the trial court is -affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 48, 1908 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kauther-v-vigransky-ohcircthamilton-1908.