Kaushal v. Indiana

138 S. Ct. 2567
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 28, 2018·No. No. 17–1356.·Published·Cited by 30 cases

Opinion

Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissenting.

The Court grants, vacates, and remands this case in light of Jae Lee v. United States, 582 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1958, 198 L.Ed.2d 476 (2017). But Lee was handed down on June 23, 2017-almost a month before the Indiana Court of Appeals issued its decision in this case. Moreover, petitioner admits that he cited and advanced arguments based on Lee in both his petition for rehearing before the Indiana Court of Appeals and his petition for transfer to the Indiana Supreme Court. Reply Brief 3. I would accordingly deny the petition for the reasons stated in Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Webster v. Cooper, 558 U.S. 1039, 1040, 130 S.Ct. 456, 175 L.Ed.2d 506 (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaushal v. Indiana, 138 S. Ct. 2567 (U.S. 2018).

138 S. Ct. 2567 (Kaushal v. Indiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tony Terrell Clark v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2022
Ernest Porter v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
974 F.3d 431 (Third Circuit, 2020)
Barr v. Purkey
140 S. Ct. 2594 (Supreme Court, 2020)
White v. Kentucky
139 S. Ct. 532 (Supreme Court, 2019)
Richard Gerald Jordan v. State of Mississippi
266 So. 3d 986 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2018)
Umesh Kaushal v. State of indiana
112 N.E.3d 1138 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Lotter
301 Neb. 125 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Abdur Rahim Ambrose v. State of Mississippi
254 So. 3d 77 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2018)