Kaur v. Yong Suk Ji

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaur v. Yong Suk Ji

249 A.D.2d 450, 671 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4299

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 450 (Kaur v. Yong Suk Ji) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaur v. Yong Suk Ji, 249 A.D.2d 450, 671 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Glen Cove Child Day Care Center, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated April 15, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the cross claim insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and the cross claim are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the defendant Glen Cove Child Day Care Center, Inc. (hereinafter the Day Care Center) established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. In support of its motion, the Day Care [451]*451Center submitted, inter alia, the minutes of the examination before trial of the defendant Yong Suk Ji in which Yong indicated that the plaintiffs’ decedent was struck by Yong5s car while he was crossing a public roadway after leaving the Day Care Center’s premises. The plaintiffs’ submission in opposition was insufficient to create a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Day Care Center’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted (see, e.g., Gordon v Incorporated Vil. of Lake Grove, 173 AD2d 770). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Glen Cove Child Day Care Center, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated April 15, 1997, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the cross claim insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and the cross claim are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the defendant Glen Cove Child Day Care Center, Inc. (hereinafter the Day Care Center) established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. In support of its motion, the Day Care [451]*451Center submitted, inter alia, the minutes of the examination before trial of the defendant Yong Suk Ji in which Yong indicated that the plaintiffs’ decedent was struck by Yong5s car while he was crossing a public roadway after leaving the Day Care Center’s premises. The plaintiffs’ submission in opposition was insufficient to create a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Day Care Center’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted (see, e.g., Gordon v Incorporated Vil. of Lake Grove, 173 AD2d 770). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 450, 671 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaur-v-yong-suk-ji-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack