Kaufmann v. Held

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaufmann v. Held

177 A.D. 906

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.D. 906 (Kaufmann v. Held) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaufmann v. Held, 177 A.D. 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

This order violates the steadily maintained rule of this court through all controversies. The defendant, having set up no affirmative defense, seeks to examine plaintiff as to his cause of action and what he must prove in order to succeed. This has never been allowed in this department. The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present— Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:.

This order violates the steadily maintained rule of this court through all controversies. The defendant, having set up no affirmative defense, seeks to examine plaintiff as to his cause of action and what he must prove in order to succeed. This has never been allowed in this department. The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present— Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D. 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaufmann-v-held-nyappdiv-1917.