Kaufmann v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaufmann v. Board of Education

275 A.D.2d 890, 714 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9618

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 890 (Kaufmann v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaufmann v. Board of Education, 275 A.D.2d 890, 714 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and petition reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of respondent Board of Education, City School District of Rochester (School District), to dismiss the petition on the ground that petitioner failed to exhaust her remedies under the grievance procedures of the collective bargaining agreement. Petitioner does not allege that the School District violated her rights pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement, but alleges a violation of Education Law § 2585 (2). Therefore, it was not necessary for her to commence a grievance proceeding (see, Matter of Barrera v Frontier Cent. School Dist., 227 AD2d 890; see also, Matter of Marino v Board of Educ., 262 AD2d 321). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Polito, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and petition reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of respondent Board of Education, City School District of Rochester (School District), to dismiss the petition on the ground that petitioner failed to exhaust her remedies under the grievance procedures of the collective bargaining agreement. Petitioner does not allege that the School District violated her rights pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement, but alleges a violation of Education Law § 2585 (2). Therefore, it was not necessary for her to commence a grievance proceeding (see, Matter of Barrera v Frontier Cent. School Dist., 227 AD2d 890; see also, Matter of Marino v Board of Educ., 262 AD2d 321). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Polito, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 890, 714 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaufmann-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack