Kaufmann & Baer Co. v. Heiner
58 F.2d 1082, 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 358, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 4736, 5 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 1475
Opinion
These eases rest on their own peculiar and unusual facts. These have been fully discussed, as well as the law on the subject, in the comprehensive opinion of the court below, 34 F.(2d) 698. Finding ourselves in accord therewith, its judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kaufmann & Baer Co. v. Heiner, 58 F.2d 1082, 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 358, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 4736, 5 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 1475 (3d Cir. 1931).
58 F.2d 1082 (Kaufmann & Baer Co. v. Heiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kaufmann & Baer Co. v. Heiner
34 F.2d 698 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1929)