Kaufman v. State
This text of 429 So. 2d 841 (Kaufman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Grace Mary KAUFMAN a/K/a Grace Difabio a/K/a Sandy Jenkins a/K/a Sandra Jenkins a/K/a Grace Mary Sieroslawski a/K/a Mary Grace Welch, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Albert J. Zemlock, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The test to be applied in appellate review of denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is whether any rational trier of fact could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Viewing the record evidence most favorably to the conclusion reached by the trier of fact, Douglas v. State, 214 So.2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), and resolving all conflicts in favor of the appellee, see H.D. v. State, 348 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), we find no error.
The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 So. 2d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaufman-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.