Kaufman v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.

Supreme Court

Kaufman v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.

342 U.S. 847, 72 S. Ct. 74

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 15, 1951

DocketNo. 172; No. 178

StatusPublished

This text of 342 U.S. 847 (Kaufman v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaufman v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., 342 U.S. 847, 72 S. Ct. 74 (1951).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals [848]*848for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.

William Radner, Odell Kominers and Henry G. Fischer for petitioners in No. 172. Thurman Arnold, Edward J. Ennis and Harry M. Plotkin for petitioner in No. 178. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Baynton and George B. Searls for McGrath et al., respondents in No. 172 and McGrath, respondent in No. 178, and with them were David Schwartz and Sidney B. Jacoby in No. 172 and James L. Morrisson, Myron C. Baum and Joseph Laufer in No. 178. Roger J. Whiteford and John J. Wilson for Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.; and William P. MacCracken, Jr'., Urban A. Lavery and William W. Barron for Remington Rand, Inc., respondents in No. 172. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals [848]*848for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.

William Radner, Odell Kominers and Henry G. Fischer for petitioners in No. 172. Thurman Arnold, Edward J. Ennis and Harry M. Plotkin for petitioner in No. 178. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Baynton and George B. Searls for McGrath et al., respondents in No. 172 and McGrath, respondent in No. 178, and with them were David Schwartz and Sidney B. Jacoby in No. 172 and James L. Morrisson, Myron C. Baum and Joseph Laufer in No. 178. Roger J. Whiteford and John J. Wilson for Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.; and William P. MacCracken, Jr'., Urban A. Lavery and William W. Barron for Remington Rand, Inc., respondents in No. 172. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 U.S. 847, 72 S. Ct. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaufman-v-societe-internationale-pour-participations-industrielles-et-scotus-1951.