Kaufman v. O'Hagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaufman v. O'Hagan

52 A.D.2d 562, 382 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12127

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 23, 1976·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 25, 1976, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The complaint adequately sets forth issues requiring trial, which should proceed promptly on the date now set, April 28, 1976. If plaintiffs-respondents are not ready to proceed at that time, application may be made at Trial Term to dissolve the outstanding injunction. On balance of the. equities, it appears that serious possibilities of hardship justify maintaining the status quo, provided that trial be not unduly delayed. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Murphy, Silverman and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 25, 1976, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The complaint adequately sets forth issues requiring trial, which should proceed promptly on the date now set, April 28, 1976. If plaintiffs-respondents are not ready to proceed at that time, application may be made at Trial Term to dissolve the outstanding injunction. On balance of the. equities, it appears that serious possibilities of hardship justify maintaining the status quo, provided that trial be not unduly delayed. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Murphy, Silverman and Nunez, JJ.

Kaufman v. O'Hagan, 52 A.D.2d 562, 382 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

52 A.D.2d 562 (Kaufman v. O'Hagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.