Kaufman v. MacDonald

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kaufman v. MacDonald

545 So. 2d 913, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1031, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2244, 1989 WL 39563

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1989·No. Nos. 87-2413, 88-1363·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte consolidate these two appeals, both arising out of the same medical malpractice action. We affirm on the merits of the main appeal, finding that no reversible error has been demonstrated. We do not believe the record supports, for instance, appellants’ claim that they were prejudiced by the court’s instructions to the jury or the form of the verdict.

We also affirm the award of attorney’s fees to the appellee, but certify the issue raised to the supreme court as a question of great public importance.

Does the holding in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985) preclude an attorney’s fee in a medical malpractice action above the percentage amount set out in the contingency fee agreement between claimant and her counsel, where the agreement provides that the fee upon recovery shall be the higher of the percentage amount or an amount awarded by the court?

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte consolidate these two appeals, both arising out of the same medical malpractice action. We affirm on the merits of the main appeal, finding that no reversible error has been demonstrated. We do not believe the record supports, for instance, appellants’ claim that they were prejudiced by the court’s instructions to the jury or the form of the verdict.

We also affirm the award of attorney’s fees to the appellee, but certify the issue raised to the supreme court as a question of great public importance.

Does the holding in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985) preclude an attorney’s fee in a medical malpractice action above the percentage amount set out in the contingency fee agreement between claimant and her counsel, where the agreement provides that the fee upon recovery shall be the higher of the percentage amount or an amount awarded by the court?

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Kaufman v. MacDonald, 545 So. 2d 913, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1031, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2244, 1989 WL 39563 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

545 So. 2d 913 (Kaufman v. MacDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related