Kaufman v. Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaufman v. Kaufman

159 A.D.2d 279

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kaufman v. Kaufman. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 A.D.2d 786 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1990·Published

Opinion

Decree of Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County (Lee L. Holzman, S.), entered October 27, 1988, which decreed that letters of administration upon the goods, chattels and credits of the deceased be awarded to Murray Kaufman and William Kaufman, brothers of the decedent, is unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The objectant, another brother of decedent, has failed to establish that the petitioners are unfit to serve as coadministrators of the estate in question. The petitioners hold responsible positions in business and have served as coexecutors of their mother’s estate without incident. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County (Lee L. Holzman, S.), entered October 27, 1988, which decreed that letters of administration upon the goods, chattels and credits of the deceased be awarded to Murray Kaufman and William Kaufman, brothers of the decedent, is unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The objectant, another brother of decedent, has failed to establish that the petitioners are unfit to serve as coadministrators of the estate in question. The petitioners hold responsible positions in business and have served as coexecutors of their mother’s estate without incident. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Kaufman v. Kaufman, 159 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

159 A.D.2d 279 (Kaufman v. Kaufman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.