Kaufman v. Kaufman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Kaufman v. Kaufman

118 So. 2d 901, 239 La. 500, 1960 La. LEXIS 948

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 21, 1960

DocketNo. 45022

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 118 So. 2d 901 (Kaufman v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaufman v. Kaufman, 118 So. 2d 901, 239 La. 500, 1960 La. LEXIS 948 (La. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

McCALEB, Justice.

On November 9, 1959, plaintiff secured a judgment of divorce against his wife and was awarded the custody and control of their three minor children, Junius Lee, Melenena and Linda Kaufman. Defendant was granted a suspensive appeal from this judgment.

Plaintiff has moved to dismiss the appeal, insofar as it suspends execution of that part of the judgment awarding him custody of the abovementioned children.

The motion is well founded. It is settled that a party appealing from a judgment affecting the custody of a child is not entitled to have execution stayed during the pendency of the appeal. The reason for this is that the child, being the ward of the court, is always subject to the authority of the judge having original jurisdiction. However, when a suspensive appeal has been granted inadvertently, as was evidently the case here, it is not dismissed in its entirety but is effective as a devolutive appeal. Downey v. Downey, 183 La. 424, 164 So. 160; Cressione v. Millet, 212 La. 691, 33 So.2d 198; Cox v. Cox, 212 La. 726, 33 So.2d 500; Wyatt v. Wyatt, 228 La. 77, 91 So.2d 775 and Wascome v. Wascome, 228 La. 607, 83 So.2d 644.

The appeal is dismissed insofar as it suspends the execution of the order awarding plaintiff the custody of his children. In all other respects, it remains in full force and effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCALEB, Justice.

On November 9, 1959, plaintiff secured a judgment of divorce against his wife and was awarded the custody and control of their three minor children, Junius Lee, Melenena and Linda Kaufman. Defendant was granted a suspensive appeal from this judgment.

Plaintiff has moved to dismiss the appeal, insofar as it suspends execution of that part of the judgment awarding him custody of the abovementioned children.

The motion is well founded. It is settled that a party appealing from a judgment affecting the custody of a child is not entitled to have execution stayed during the pendency of the appeal. The reason for this is that the child, being the ward of the court, is always subject to the authority of the judge having original jurisdiction. However, when a suspensive appeal has been granted inadvertently, as was evidently the case here, it is not dismissed in its entirety but is effective as a devolutive appeal. Downey v. Downey, 183 La. 424, 164 So. 160; Cressione v. Millet, 212 La. 691, 33 So.2d 198; Cox v. Cox, 212 La. 726, 33 So.2d 500; Wyatt v. Wyatt, 228 La. 77, 91 So.2d 775 and Wascome v. Wascome, 228 La. 607, 83 So.2d 644.

The appeal is dismissed insofar as it suspends the execution of the order awarding plaintiff the custody of his children. In all other respects, it remains in full force and effect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 So. 2d 901, 239 La. 500, 1960 La. LEXIS 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaufman-v-kaufman-la-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack