Kaufman v. Goldman Stores Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaufman v. Goldman Stores Corp.

252 A.D. 666, 300 N.Y.S. 773, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5757

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the facts adduced in this record clearly show that the acts of the employee constituted an acceptance by him of the termination of the alleged oral employment agreement.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the facts adduced in this record clearly show that the acts of the employee constituted an acceptance by him of the termination of the alleged oral employment agreement.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Kaufman v. Goldman Stores Corp., 252 A.D. 666, 300 N.Y.S. 773, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 666 (Kaufman v. Goldman Stores Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.