Kaufman v. Goldman Stores Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaufman v. Goldman Stores Corp.

252 A.D. 666, 300 N.Y.S. 773, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5757

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 666 (Kaufman v. Goldman Stores Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaufman v. Goldman Stores Corp., 252 A.D. 666, 300 N.Y.S. 773, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the facts adduced in this record clearly show that the acts of the employee constituted an acceptance by him of the termination of the alleged oral employment agreement.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the facts adduced in this record clearly show that the acts of the employee constituted an acceptance by him of the termination of the alleged oral employment agreement.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 666, 300 N.Y.S. 773, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaufman-v-goldman-stores-corp-nyappdiv-1937.