Kaufman v. Farah

104 N.E.2d 368, 303 N.Y. 819, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1303
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 24, 1952·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the complaint is legally insufficient (Civ. Prac. Act, § 241; Kalmanash v. Smith, 291 N. Y. 142, 153; Naumer v. Gray, 28 App. Div. 529; Steuer v. Hart, 175 App. Div. 829; see, also, Lanyon’s Detective Agency v. Cochrane, 240 N. Y. 274, 277), with the modification, however, that appellant be given ten days to plead over. The judgment should be modified by providing that plaintiff may have ten days in which to serve an amended complaint on payment of costs in all courts, and, as so modified, affirmed.

If the appellant fails to avail himself of such modification, then the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Lewis, Conway, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion. Loughran, Ch. J., and Desmond, J., dissent and vote to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that this pleading sufficiently complies with section 241 of the Civil Practice Act.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaufman v. Farah, 104 N.E.2d 368, 303 N.Y. 819, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1303 (N.Y. 1952).

104 N.E.2d 368 (Kaufman v. Farah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosenblatt v. Wolf
17 A.D.2d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Kaufman v. Farah
281 A.D. 48 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)