Kaufman v. Eagle Lion Classics, Inc.

285 A.D. 931, 138 N.Y.S.2d 463

This text of 285 A.D. 931 (Kaufman v. Eagle Lion Classics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kaufman v. Eagle Lion Classics, Inc., 285 A.D. 931, 138 N.Y.S.2d 463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinions

Memorandum by the Court. A party defendant may withdraw its answer and allow judgment to be entered, but we know of no authority for a defendant simply withdrawing from a case except by consent. The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with leave to appellant, if so advised, to move with respect to the pleadings or for judgment on the pleadings or for summary judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 A.D. 931, 138 N.Y.S.2d 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaufman-v-eagle-lion-classics-inc-nyappdiv-1955.