Kaufman v. City of New York

273 A.D. 821, 76 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4792

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment dismissing the complaint reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The dismissal by the trial court “on the merits” before the close of plaintiff’s evidence was error (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482); and the judgment thereupon entered, incorrectly reciting that the motion to dismiss was granted “ at the close of the case ”, and not providing that the dismissal was “ without prejudice” must be reversed. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482; Hollenbeck v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 215 App. Div. 609, affd. 243 H. Y. 540; Assalone v. Hazel, 243 App, Div. 176.) The judgment entered was not a default judgment. (Citizens Trust Co. v. Prescott & Son, Inc., 221 App. Div. 426.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaufman v. City of New York, 273 A.D. 821, 76 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 821 (Kaufman v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hollenbeck v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford, Connecticut
215 A.D. 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Citizens Trust Co. v. R. Prescott & Son, Inc.
221 A.D. 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)