Kaufman v. Abrams

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kaufman v. Abrams

90 N.Y.S. 1068

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1068 (Kaufman v. Abrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kaufman v. Abrams, 90 N.Y.S. 1068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the evidence given for and against the allowance of the items claimed by these parties as against each other, the judgment for the defendant upon the counterclaim is found to be supported in the amount allowed. The dispute involved a mere question of credibility of interested witnesses, and the matter of values was based upon opinion evidence, which, while it might have been made stronger had objection to the witness’ qualifications been taken, was sufficient in the absence of objection at the trial.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the evidence given for and against the allowance of the items claimed by these parties as against each other, the judgment for the defendant upon the counterclaim is found to be supported in the amount allowed. The dispute involved a mere question of credibility of interested witnesses, and the matter of values was based upon opinion evidence, which, while it might have been made stronger had objection to the witness’ qualifications been taken, was sufficient in the absence of objection at the trial.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.Y.S. 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaufman-v-abrams-nyappterm-1904.