Kauffman v. Kebert
This text of 219 F.2d 113 (Kauffman v. Kebert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
219 F.2d 113
Harold E. KAUFFMAN, Administrator of the Estate of William E. McQuown, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee.
v.
Paul KEBERT, Defendant,
Pauline Kebert and Larry Kebert, a Minor by Paul Kebert, his Father and Next Friend, Petitioners-Appellants.
No. 11432.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued January 18, 1955.
Decided January 31, 1955.
Robert A. Jarvis, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Kenneth W. Rice, Meadville, Pa., Carney & Carney, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.
Frank B. Quinn, Erie, Pa. (A. Grant Walker, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The district court, 16 F.R.D. 225, dismissed the petition of appellants to intervene in this cause under the permissive intervention clause of Rule 24 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. We are satisfied that such action by the court was proper. Since there existed other adequate means of petitioners asserting their rights we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Cameron v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, 1 Cir., 157 F.2d 993, 997.
The appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 F.2d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kauffman-v-kebert-ca3-1955.