Kauffman v. Halleck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kauffman v. Halleck

262 A.D. 951, 29 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6585

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 951 (Kauffman v. Halleck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kauffman v. Halleck, 262 A.D. 951, 29 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified on the law and facts by reducing the referee’s fees from $700 to $400 and by striking out the extra allowance of $400 to plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In view of appellants’ statement in their brief that they desired that this appeal be considered on its merits, we have so considered it and conclude that the referee’s fees should be reduced from $700 to $400 and that the additional allowance to respondent of $400 should be stricken out. All concur, except McCurn, J., not voting. (The judgment confirms the report of a referee settling the accounts of plaintiff as trustee, discharges the trustee, and appoints a receiver to take over the assets in an action to secure the judicial settlement of the accounts of a trustee.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified on the law and facts by reducing the referee’s fees from $700 to $400 and by striking out the extra allowance of $400 to plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In view of appellants’ statement in their brief that they desired that this appeal be considered on its merits, we have so considered it and conclude that the referee’s fees should be reduced from $700 to $400 and that the additional allowance to respondent of $400 should be stricken out. All concur, except McCurn, J., not voting. (The judgment confirms the report of a referee settling the accounts of plaintiff as trustee, discharges the trustee, and appoints a receiver to take over the assets in an action to secure the judicial settlement of the accounts of a trustee.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 951, 29 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kauffman-v-halleck-nyappdiv-1941.