Kau Hui v. Dang (Paul, Vivian), Haseyama (Sanford), Shiroma (Richard), Chun (Harold, Shirley), Tom (Wallace, Pauline), Lau (Howard), Taylor (Carroll)

846 F.2d 1382
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 29, 1988·No. 86-2060·Published

Opinion

846 F.2d 1382

Kau Hui
v.
Dang (Paul, Vivian), Haseyama (Sanford), Shiroma (Richard),
Chun (Harold, Shirley), Tom (Wallace, Pauline),
Lau (Howard), Taylor (Carroll)

NOS. 85-2729, 86-2060

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

APR 29, 1988

Appeal From: D.Hawaii

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kau Hui v. Dang (Paul, Vivian), Haseyama (Sanford), Shiroma (Richard), Chun (Harold, Shirley), Tom (Wallace, Pauline), Lau (Howard), Taylor (Carroll), 846 F.2d 1382 (9th Cir. 1988).

846 F.2d 1382 (Kau Hui v. Dang (Paul, Vivian), Haseyama (Sanford), Shiroma (Richard), Chun (Harold, Shirley), Tom (Wallace, Pauline), Lau (Howard), Taylor (Carroll)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.