Katzow v. Borinstein
This text of 63 N.E.2d 146 (Katzow v. Borinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is the. second appeal of this case. See Borinstein v. Katzow (1944), 222 Ind. 548, 55 N. E. (2d) 260. On the former appeal the Supreme Court decided that the complaint was demurrable. .
An amended complaint was then filed in the trial court and a demurrer sustained to it. This appeal is from that ruling.
There is no substantial difference between the amended and the original ’complaint. The operative facts remain the same. Our Supreme Court held that such operative facts do not constitute a cause of action.
Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 63 N. E. (2d) 146.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 N.E.2d 146, 116 Ind. App. 699, 1945 Ind. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katzow-v-borinstein-indctapp-1945.