Katznelson v. Yonkers Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Katznelson v. Yonkers Railroad

258 A.D. 1078, 18 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8963

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 1078 (Katznelson v. Yonkers Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katznelson v. Yonkers Railroad, 258 A.D. 1078, 18 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8963 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover for personal injuries and property damage, tried in the City Court of Yonkers by the court without a jury. The appeal is by plaintiff from the judgment in his favor on the ground that the award of $200 is inadequate. Judgment, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. This court adopts the findings and conclusions printed at folios 44-46 of the record on appeal, as a matter of appellate power. No opinion. Appeal from the order granting defendant’s motion to amend the findings of fact after judgment had been entered thereon dismissed, without costs. The matter has become academic. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover for personal injuries and property damage, tried in the City Court of Yonkers by the court without a jury. The appeal is by plaintiff from the judgment in his favor on the ground that the award of $200 is inadequate. Judgment, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. This court adopts the findings and conclusions printed at folios 44-46 of the record on appeal, as a matter of appellate power. No opinion. Appeal from the order granting defendant’s motion to amend the findings of fact after judgment had been entered thereon dismissed, without costs. The matter has become academic. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 1078, 18 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katznelson-v-yonkers-railroad-nyappdiv-1940.