Katzman v. Waldow
This text of 231 A.D. 798 (Katzman v. Waldow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of Special Term and judgment of Buffalo City Court reversed on the law and facts, and a new trial granted in Buffalo City Court, with costs in all courts to the appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the only theory upon which defendant could be found negligent is in" respect to repairs to the building resulting in damage to the goods of his tenant, and upon this matter plaintiff has failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the water which damaged plaintiff’s goods came into the building through any hole in the roof made in the "course of such repairs, which is the only defect suggested. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katzman-v-waldow-nyappdiv-1930.