Katzman v. Koerner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Katzman v. Koerner

127 So. 3d 551, 2012 WL 5349388, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18971

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-4201

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 3d 551 (Katzman v. Koerner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katzman v. Koerner, 127 So. 3d 551, 2012 WL 5349388, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18971 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the non-party deponents’ petition for writ of certiorari which seeks to quash an order denying petitioner’s motion for protective order and ordering the deponents to produce discovery. When ruling, the trial court did not have the benefit of this court’s modified opinions in Katzman v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc., 76 So.3d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), rev. dismissed, 88 So.3d 149 (Fla.2012), or Katzman v. Ranjana Corp., 90 So.3d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), both of which were issued after the trial court’s order on review in this case. Based upon those cases, we grant the writ and quash the order, directing the trial court to reconsider the issues in light of Rediron and Ranjana.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the non-party deponents’ petition for writ of certiorari which seeks to quash an order denying petitioner’s motion for protective order and ordering the deponents to produce discovery. When ruling, the trial court did not have the benefit of this court’s modified opinions in Katzman v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc., 76 So.3d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), rev. dismissed, 88 So.3d 149 (Fla.2012), or Katzman v. Ranjana Corp., 90 So.3d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), both of which were issued after the trial court’s order on review in this case. Based upon those cases, we grant the writ and quash the order, directing the trial court to reconsider the issues in light of Rediron and Ranjana.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 3d 551, 2012 WL 5349388, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katzman-v-koerner-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack