Katzman v. Hoffman
211 F.2d 701, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2609
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 2, 1954
Docket11218_1
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 211 F.2d 701 (Katzman v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Katzman v. Hoffman, 211 F.2d 701, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2609 (3d Cir. 1954).
Opinion
The order appealed from is not a final decision within the purview of Section 1291, Title 28, United States Code, the court below having filed no certificate in accordance with Rule 54(b), F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lambert C. Boer and L. Thelma Boer, His Wife v. Borg-Warner Corporation Richard G. Sholley and Helen S. Sholley, His Wife
364 F.2d 907 (Third Circuit, 1966)
Selmes Paul Funkhouser v. City of Newark, a Municipal Corporation of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent, And/or the Port of New York Authority, Etc.
312 F.2d 383 (Third Circuit, 1963)
Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Company
224 F.2d 198 (Second Circuit, 1955)
Rieser v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
224 F.2d 198 (Second Circuit, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
211 F.2d 701, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katzman-v-hoffman-ca3-1954.