Katzin v. Kruvant

133 A. 516, 100 N.J. Eq. 569, 15 Stock. 569, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 647
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1927·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Church.

*572 For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Trenoi-iard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katzin v. Kruvant, 133 A. 516, 100 N.J. Eq. 569, 15 Stock. 569, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 647 (N.J. 1927).

133 A. 516 (Katzin v. Kruvant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.