Katzenelenson v. Brody

176 A.D. 929

This text of 176 A.D. 929 (Katzenelenson v. Brody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katzenelenson v. Brody, 176 A.D. 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county un initnously affirmed, with costs, on authority of Gfavrilutz v. Savage (166 App. Div. 309). Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gavrilutz v. Savage
166 A.D. 309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katzenelenson-v-brody-nyappdiv-1917.