Katzenberger v. Raph

814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127501, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 242
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 7, 2012·No. No. A12-0059·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on December 14, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view”, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

W_ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katzenberger v. Raph, 814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127501, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 242 (Mich. 2012).

814 N.W.2d 357 (Katzenberger v. Raph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)