Katzenberger v. Raph

814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127501, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 242
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 7, 2012
DocketNo. A12-0059
StatusPublished

This text of 814 N.W.2d 357 (Katzenberger v. Raph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katzenberger v. Raph, 814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127501, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 242 (Mich. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on December 14, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view”, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

W_ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127501, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katzenberger-v-raph-minn-2012.