Katz v. Zapela

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Katz v. Zapela

163 A. 662, 110 N.J.L. 14, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 404

DecidedJanuary 5, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A. 662 (Katz v. Zapela) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katz v. Zapela, 163 A. 662, 110 N.J.L. 14, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 404 (N.J. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

*15 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 258.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*15 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 258.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A. 662, 110 N.J.L. 14, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-zapela-nj-1933.