Katz v. Willner
137 A. 917, 103 N.J.L. 698, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 251
This text of 137 A. 917 (Katz v. Willner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Katz v. Willner, 137 A. 917, 103 N.J.L. 698, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 251 (N.J. 1927).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Continental Life Insurance v. Gough
172 S.E. 264 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 A. 917, 103 N.J.L. 698, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-willner-nj-1927.