Katz v. State

604 So. 2d 844, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7547, 1992 WL 143649
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1992·No. No. 91-01264·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant pled no contest to charges of possession of cocaine, possession of dia-zepam, and possession of cannabis. On this appeal he raises three issues concern[845]*845ing his plea and the conditions and provisions of the order of probation entered by the trial court. We find merit in only one point.

For the reason stated in Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), we strike the special condition of probation numbered 6 which prohibits the appellant from using intoxicants to excess and visiting places where intoxicants, drugs or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used.

Affirmed as modified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., ALTENBERND, J., and BENTLEY, E. RANDOLPH, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katz v. State, 604 So. 2d 844, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7547, 1992 WL 143649 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

604 So. 2d 844 (Katz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
604 So. 2d 844 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)