Katz v. Shomron
This text of 116 A.D.3d 777 (Katz v. Shomron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Katz, J.), dated February 5, 2013, which, without a hearing, granted the mother’s petition for permission to relocate with the parties’ children to Rockland County or Westchester County.
[778]*778Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court possessed adequate relevant information to enable it to make an informed and provident determination, without a hearing, as to whether it was in the subject children’s best interests to relocate with their mother (see Matter of Horn v Zullo, 6 AD3d 536 [2004]). The mother established a change of circumstances and that the proposed relocation to Rockland County or Westchester County would serve the subject children’s best interests (see Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727 [1996]). The mother also established that the proposed move would not have a negative impact on the children’s relationship with the father (see Matter of Linn v Wilson, 68 AD3d 1767 [2009]).
The father’s remaining contention is without merit. Dillon, J.E, Hall, Austin and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
116 A.D.3d 777, 982 N.Y.S.2d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-shomron-nyappdiv-2014.