Katz v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Katz v. Rosen

59 A.D.2d 524, 397 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13306

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 1, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 524 (Katz v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katz v. Rosen, 59 A.D.2d 524, 397 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions (1) on a bond and mortgage and (2), inter alia, for conversation of fire insurance proceeds, the appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 27, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, directed the application of insurance proceeds toward delinquent mortgage payments, and dismissed other causes of action, counterclaims and affirmative defenses. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The trial court properly determined that there was no conversion. Based upon plaintiff’s conduct, she should be estopped from asserting that she had not agreed to allow defendant Rosen to use the insurance proceeds for repairs. At oral argument, plaintiff withdrew her claims (1) that the Trial Judge erred in denying interest on the past due mortgage payments (Point IV) and (2) that the Trial Judge did not have the right to direct that a portion of the fire insurance proceeds be held in trust (Point VII). We have examined plaintiff’s other causes of action and find that they were properly dismissed by the Trial Judge. Hopkins, J. P., Shapiro, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions (1) on a bond and mortgage and (2), inter alia, for conversation of fire insurance proceeds, the appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 27, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, directed the application of insurance proceeds toward delinquent mortgage payments, and dismissed other causes of action, counterclaims and affirmative defenses. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The trial court properly determined that there was no conversion. Based upon plaintiff’s conduct, she should be estopped from asserting that she had not agreed to allow defendant Rosen to use the insurance proceeds for repairs. At oral argument, plaintiff withdrew her claims (1) that the Trial Judge erred in denying interest on the past due mortgage payments (Point IV) and (2) that the Trial Judge did not have the right to direct that a portion of the fire insurance proceeds be held in trust (Point VII). We have examined plaintiff’s other causes of action and find that they were properly dismissed by the Trial Judge. Hopkins, J. P., Shapiro, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 524, 397 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-rosen-nyappdiv-1977.