Katz v. Roberts

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 1994
Docket93-2231
StatusPublished

This text of Katz v. Roberts (Katz v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katz v. Roberts, (1st Cir. 1994).

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


September 15, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 93-2231

LESTER KATZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

DENNIS ROBERTS,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Frank H. Freedman, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge,
_____________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
____________________
and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
_____________

____________________

Lester Katz on brief pro se.
___________
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and James S. Whitcomb,
__________________ ___________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. The judgment of the district court is
__________

affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's
________

October 26, 1993 memorandum and order and in the magistrate

judge's November 23, 1992 report and recommendation adopted

by the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Katz v. Roberts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-roberts-ca1-1994.