Katz v. New York Life Insurance
19 A.2d 830, 126 N.J.L. 370, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 326
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Katz v. New York Life Insurance, 19 A.2d 830, 126 N.J.L. 370, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 326 (N.J. 1941).
19 A.2d 830 (Katz v. New York Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pollack v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
138 F.2d 123 (Third Circuit, 1943)