Katz v. Moss
This text of 269 A.D. 854 (Katz v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, resettled order directing the Commissioner of Licenses of the City of New York to issue a pool and billiard license lo the respondent affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the application on the ground that the action of the Commissioner was justified by the general reputation of the place. [184 Misc. 133.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 854, 56 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-moss-nyappdiv-1945.