Katz v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
This text of 147 S.W.3d 813 (Katz v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Harry M. Katz, M.D. (“Doctor”) appeals the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission and the Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (collectively “Commission”).1
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for om* decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 S.W.3d 813, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-missouri-board-of-registration-for-the-healing-arts-moctapp-2004.