Katz v. Liederman
32 Misc. 712, 65 N.Y.S. 1137
Opinion
There is no question of law involved in this appeal. The justice had the advantage of seeing the witnesses, and an opportunity of judging as to the credit to be extended to each of them. His decision, upon the conflicting testimony, should not be disturbed.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Katz v. Liederman, 32 Misc. 712, 65 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
32 Misc. 712 (Katz v. Liederman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. Herold
34 Misc. 801 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)