Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Katz v. Liederman

Katz v. Liederman

32 Misc. 712, 65 N.Y.S. 1137
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 Misc. 712 (Katz v. Liederman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katz v. Liederman, 32 Misc. 712, 65 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no question of law involved in this appeal. The justice had the advantage of seeing the witnesses, and an opportunity of judging as to the credit to be extended to each of them. His decision, upon the conflicting testimony, should not be disturbed.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Herold
34 Misc. 801 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 712, 65 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-liederman-nyappterm-1900.