Katz v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Katz v. Katz

132 A.D.2d 529, 517 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49057

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.2d 529 (Katz v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Katz v. Katz, 132 A.D.2d 529, 517 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fierro, J.), dated April 7, 1986, as denied her cross motion for an upward modification of child support payments to be paid by the defendant husband pursuant to the parties’ judgment of divorce.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court correctly concluded that the plaintiff wife failed to establish that a change in circumstances had occurred which warranted an upward modification of support in the best interest of the child (see, Matter of Michaels v Michaels, 56 NY2d 924). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fierro, J.), dated April 7, 1986, as denied her cross motion for an upward modification of child support payments to be paid by the defendant husband pursuant to the parties’ judgment of divorce.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court correctly concluded that the plaintiff wife failed to establish that a change in circumstances had occurred which warranted an upward modification of support in the best interest of the child (see, Matter of Michaels v Michaels, 56 NY2d 924). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.2d 529, 517 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-katz-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack