Katz v. Katz

33 A.D.2d 740, 305 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2734
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 2, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 740 (Katz v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katz v. Katz, 33 A.D.2d 740, 305 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Order, entered on June 11, 1969, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent of striking therefrom the provision directing a reference on the question of the outgoing attorneys’ fee and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The facts presented, especially the absence of any claim of an attorney’s lien, indicate that the outgoing attorneys’ proper remedy is a plenary action and not the disposition of their claim by means of a reference in a special proceeding. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Rosenblum
121 A.D.2d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A.D.2d 740, 305 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-katz-nyappdiv-1969.