Katz v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Katz v. Katz

33 A.D.2d 740, 305 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2734

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, entered on June 11, 1969, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent of striking therefrom the provision directing a reference on the question of the outgoing attorneys’ fee and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The facts presented, especially the absence of any claim of an attorney’s lien, indicate that the outgoing attorneys’ proper remedy is a plenary action and not the disposition of their claim by means of a reference in a special proceeding. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on June 11, 1969, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent of striking therefrom the provision directing a reference on the question of the outgoing attorneys’ fee and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The facts presented, especially the absence of any claim of an attorney’s lien, indicate that the outgoing attorneys’ proper remedy is a plenary action and not the disposition of their claim by means of a reference in a special proceeding. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.

Katz v. Katz, 33 A.D.2d 740, 305 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

33 A.D.2d 740 (Katz v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related