Katz v. Katz
163 A.D. 886
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Clarke and Scott, JJ., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Katz v. Katz, 163 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
163 A.D. 886 (Katz v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.