Katz v. . Katz
112 N.E. 1061, 217 N.Y. 651, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1411
This text of 112 N.E. 1061 (Katz v. . Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Katz v. . Katz, 112 N.E. 1061, 217 N.Y. 651, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1411 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, "with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Otselic Valley National Bank v. Dapson
170 Misc. 514 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 N.E. 1061, 217 N.Y. 651, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-katz-ny-1916.