Katz v. . Katz

112 N.E. 1061, 217 N.Y. 651, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1411

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, "with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Katz v. . Katz, 112 N.E. 1061, 217 N.Y. 651, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1411 (N.Y. 1916).

Pincite

112 N.E. 1061 (Katz v. . Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.