Katz v. Katz

166 A. 176, 113 N.J. Eq. 75, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 984
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 27, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 166 A. 176 (Katz v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Katz v. Katz, 166 A. 176, 113 N.J. Eq. 75, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 984 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

*77 Pee Cueiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tkenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lynch v. Lynch
677 A.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1996)
Bond v. Bond
83 A.2d 794 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A. 176, 113 N.J. Eq. 75, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/katz-v-katz-nj-1933.