Katz v. Katz
166 A. 176, 113 N.J. Eq. 75, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 984
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tkenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Katz v. Katz, 166 A. 176, 113 N.J. Eq. 75, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 984 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 176 (Katz v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lynch v. Lynch
677 A.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1996)
Bond v. Bond
83 A.2d 794 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)