Katz v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Katz v. Johnston

35 A. 981, 178 Pa. 346, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1176

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 9, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 28·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Ctjriam,

We find no error in the proceedings leading up to the decree from which this appeal was taken, nor in the decree itself. The findings of fact were amply warranted by the pleadings and proofs; and the conclusions drawn from the facts thus established appear to be substantially correct. On these findings and legal conclusions of the court below, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs, to be paid by appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ctjriam,

We find no error in the proceedings leading up to the decree from which this appeal was taken, nor in the decree itself. The findings of fact were amply warranted by the pleadings and proofs; and the conclusions drawn from the facts thus established appear to be substantially correct. On these findings and legal conclusions of the court below, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs, to be paid by appellant.

Katz v. Johnston, 35 A. 981, 178 Pa. 346, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1176 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

35 A. 981 (Katz v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related